Silencing the Muse: Exploring AI’s Deadly Grasp on Human Creativity

Is human creativity at risk because of AI? Explore creative thinking and the influence made by neural networks in our statistics.

Exploring AI's Deadly Grasp on Human Creativity

As a digital illustrator, I was a bit intimidated when the first neural networks appeared. Even with all the downsides like multiplied fingers or pixelated backgrounds, they could still produce art with lightning speed. No torture over I-can’t-draw-this-eye-it-pisses-me-off, just a click and here you go — a picture is ready.

The same goes for other creative things such as writing books, composing music, researching, and inventing. AI learns fast and produces results fast. As more advanced Artificial Intelligence versions came out, I started to ask myself as a creator: should I even bother thinking and striving to improve my skills? Isn’t this a waste of time and I’d better ask the neural network to do everything for me? 

Why bother painting, struggling with concepts, developing and exploring them, experimenting with colors, when the digital brain can do better in just seconds? This fact has absolutely demolished my muse. So I decided to check what other people think about this situation. I started a poll and asked my friends who were artists, musicians, writers, etc. My colleagues from Shakuro didn’t stay on the sidelines and took part in my research as well. Let’s see, what they think about AI and art.

What is creativity?

But before I start, I want to tell you what I mean by creativity, because some people tend to mix it with talent, genius, artistic skills, etc.

If we take Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, then creative originates from Latin and means “to beget, give birth to”. The Wiki tells us that creativity is the ability of a person to deviate from standard ideas, rules, and patterns. It’s an essential quality of an artistic personality and is a must-have to produce artwork or writing.

So, it’s an ability to find new ways, non-standard solutions and produce original works. “Give birth” to unique ideas. This quality has great value not just in art but in the business sphere as well. Business owners taking ground-breaking approaches, developers writing experimental code, and designers building eye-catching UIs. All of these people have high chances to win a place under the sun because they have solid critical thinking and problem solving.

AI can enhance your app's usability

Neural network design concept by Shakuro

Not all people are creative, though. Only 25% of the population think they live up to their true artistic potential, while 75% keep it hidden or sleeping. There are several reasons, for example, a lot of pressure at work, education that prefers one-way solutions, reserved personality, conservative parents, and many others.

What about the reasons why people become creative? Here, it’s a great idea to refer to the movie Why Are We Creative: Centipede Dilemma, where famous artists, musicians, politicians, and producers specified various reasons.

The most common ones are, of course, parents and upbringing. Creative-thinking parents and their way of thinking influence their children greatly. For example, Paul Arden, a famous writer, was greatly inspired by his father Lesley Arden and his illustrations (for instance, pictures showing buildings made of cloth pegs. Who would even think of that?).

Next, we can pinpoint societal norms. The traditions also inspire or suppress us. John Cleese, an actor, thinks that a person has high chances to become creative if they face a wide range of social and cultural rules to connect into one pattern. On the contrary, a person growing up in a very conformist community won’t be creative

The next reason echoes in my heart: we are born this way. Reed Hastings, the co-founder, and executive chairman of Netflix, ensures that we all are born with a spark in our souls. When the hardships of life come in, the spark fades away quickly.

Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once he grows up.

Pablo Picasso

If you ask me as an illustrator: Mary, why are you creative? I’d say the practically same. I’ve always been like this – thinking, building stories, imagining situations, constructing pictures in my mind like a puzzle that I later transfer to paper. And this process brings me joy.

Does AI have the same, many-sided characteristics? And also…

Integrate Artificial Intelligence designing into your processes

Discover Mars – Real Estate by Karin

Can human creativity be reproduced?

My answer is no. This unique feature has several qualities that machine learning doesn’t have, and probably won’t have in the near future.

First of all, it’s emotional intelligence. Our creative thinking is based on emotions and personal experiences. We express ourselves through paintings, books, videos, or behavioral patterns. What’s more, one situation may raise different emotions in two people and lead to different creations. In art, there is a whole style based on emotions called expressionism. The artist is more concerned with portraying an emotional experience than with depicting realistic details.

Second, we make mistakes and take advantage of them. A careless stroke can lead to creating a masterpiece. As an illustrator, I assure you: every time I start drawing, I do not know where exactly the process will take me. There were thousands of times when I had a certain idea in my head that transformed into a completely different picture on the canvas. And the result was even better than I imagined. So each creative journey is unique, where the outcome and the path are unknown.

Third, our creativity is shaped by the society we live in. All the patterns, rules, beliefs, and traditions are somehow reflected in the works.

Finally, we can read between the lines and understand the context or hidden meanings, that are also a part of creative thinking. For instance, an artist envelops secret messages in colors, objects, or lighting, that shows familiar situations from a new perspective and adds originality.

AI doesn’t have any of these qualities. Its responses are solely based on the training data. So there are no true emotions, innovation, choices, struggles, or discoveries. Yes, the digital brain makes mistakes because of data bias and copies emotions if the prompt says so. But unlike humans, its decisions are not triggered by accidents. So, we can’t consider algorithmic decision-making creative by any means, and it is unable to reproduce the human’s spark.

We can’t consider algorithmic decision-making creative

AI Fusion landing page by zohura sharna

AI is killing our creativity? Let’s ask around

Now that we’ve defined the core of our discussion, let’s switch to my poll about the influence of neural networks. I’ve been gathering data for about a week and asked 43 people. As for the professions, the most common were developer (10 people), illustrator (9), and UI\UX designer (8). I also managed to get opinions from a musician, an English teacher, and several SEO specialists. So, as you can see, there is a wide range of occupations.

Starting with general information, 62.8% have been using neural networks for one up to six months. 18.6% have been getting on with AI for up to a year. 9.3% said they have been using neural networks for more than one year. Another 9.3% were not really sure about the period.

Most respondents (58.1%) leverage Artificial Intelligence to create images. Learning and researching are the second most popular applications. One of the most frequently used AIs is ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion, which is not surprising.

69.8% are positive about leveraging neural networks at work. 27.9% hold onto a neutral opinion. There were NO people who were against human-machine collaboration.  

This is interesting because 23.3% do not trust what Artificial Intelligence says. 62.8% check the provided information manually. Only 7% believe the digital assistant to the full.

In the next section, the respondents had to evaluate a statement from 1 to 5 depending on how close it was to their opinion. 1 meant they strongly disagree, and 5 – strongly agree.

55.8% of people research topics all by themselves before calling out for help from neural networks. However, 25.6% were not so sure. 7% do prefer to ask ChatGPT instead of googling the info.

60.5% are close to thinking that AI will definitely find a solution they’ve never thought of. Only 14% do not consider a silver bullet for every issue.

I’ve seen a billion articles on topics like – Will AI replace designers\developers\enter-any-profession? They hype people over the topic of job displacement and the future of work. Well, in my poll, only 11.6% are sure that human skills and efforts are being devalued. The rest of the respondents do not really agree with this statement.

7% ask Artificial Intelligence for help more often rather than calling out for a human specialist. At the same time, 32.6% of respondents adamantly prefer human skills and knowledge over the digital brain.

Now, when you see a beautiful work, do you doubt that it was created by a human? For my respondents, this question was rather controversial:

Human-machine collaboration

58.1% of people do not think that neural networks eliminate the unique style of every person. 27.9% are not quite sure, and 14% are sure that everyone’s works have similar features.

When we were discussing human creativity, I mentioned that our mind is shaped by society, traditions, and rules. There are no such AI limitations, therefore, people tend to believe it has more possibilities. More creative. Still, 53.5% of respondents disagree with this statement, while just 18.6% comply with it.

The final statement gives an answer to the main question of this article – is human creativity at risk? It’s surprising, but 67.5% think that AI helps people open their true potential and find unique solutions quicker. 20.9% are not quite sure, and 11.6% disagree that neural networks boost our creativity.

AI helps people open their true potential and find unique solutions quicker

That’s not all. I also asked these people to give me some real-life examples of when AI really helped with problem solving. Here are some of them:

  • I faced an unexpected response from an API code. I tried googling it but found nothing. AI explained the reason for this behavior and suggested a working fix to avoid the issue.
  • I need a fake client with a product for testing. ChatGPT was able to understand the customer’s mood and even added some details I missed. There is no bias in AI that adjusts it to some perfect picture. I can make it behave like some specific person and talk, for example, to Shaquille O’Neal.
  • Artificial Intelligence helps me create pictures starting from a certain stage, not from scratch. This saves a lot of time that I can spend improving the result. For instance, I needed to draw a girl for an ad, and I didn’t have to paint her body, struggling with references and anatomy. The neural network did all the hard work. If I drew that all by myself, I’d spend the whole day or more.
  • When I was creating covers for my books, Midjourney generated amazing variants. Most of the suggestions didn’t even cross my mind but they looked mind-blowing. I believe my online readers will definitely notice them!

As you can see, I asked only 43 people, and they were mostly positive about human-machine collaboration. This is a rather small selection but it shows the general tendencies. 

Should we be worried?

Seems like my worry is groundless: my colleagues and friends believe in AI. Although my impression seems to be outnumbered, I think it’s a normal reaction to fundamental changes. Remember how people were against cars a hundred years ago, claiming them “the devil wagons”? Well, look like we can’t live without them now. Progress is unstoppable.

 AI will not replace human specialists

From r/Design on Reddit

Despite limitations and ethical implications, AI is a versatile tool that can be a blessed weapon in the hands of people from creative industries, should they choose to use it. Cost & time reduction, quicker research, and large data analysis – are just a few benefits you get from leveraging neural networks

Still, I understand why I and some other people are worrying. This situation is just the first step leading to global changes in all spheres of our society. I’ve spoken to my colleague Tatyana, an illustrator from Shakuro, about neural networks in art. Just like me, she’s a bit intimidated since there are some artists working in the mainstream styles who have already been replaced by Artificial Intelligence. At the same time, it is a shining red sign screaming that one needs to forge ahead, polishing their skills and not. Those who won’t master neural networks will be smashed by the new reality. It’s the law of nature.

Artificial Intelligence can only support us in creative industries

Impact ad campaign

Ready to build a versatile project using the latest trends, AI, and features? Contact us and let’s develop a product using our creativity to the full!

*  *  *

Written by Mary Moore

July 24, 2023

Subscribe to Our Blog

Once a month we will send you blog updates