MVC and MVVM are patterns for separating interface code from application data and behavior. MVC uses controllers to coordinate interactions; MVVM exposes presentation state and actions through ViewModels. Neither pattern defines the entire application architecture or guarantees maintainability. Their implementation differs across server-rendered websites, UIKit applications, and declarative UI frameworks. A product can also combine an MVC backend with a differently structured mobile or web client.
Design patterns work like the plan for a jigsaw puzzle: they tell developers where each piece of code goes, so the product stays structured and easy to maintain. That holds whether it is a mobile product built by an iOS app development team or a site with a custom web design.
Below, we cover what the MVC pattern architecture is, what the MVVM pattern architecture is, when and how to use each, their features, advantages, and disadvantages, and the key differences between MVC and MVVM.
What is MVC Pattern?
Overview:
MVC, short for Model View Controller architecture, serves as the backbone of countless websites and apps you use regularly. It splits the code into three main parts: the Model, the View, and the Controller.
MVC Pattern:
Let’s take the example of an E-commerce website and break down the three key parts in simple terms.
- Model:
Picture the Model as the brain of the operation. It’s where all the data and logic live. So, if you’re browsing through a list of products on an e-commerce site, the Model would contain all the information about those products, like their names, prices, and descriptions.
- View:
The View is what you actually see on the screen. So, when you’re looking at that same e-commerce site, the View would be the page layout, the buttons you click, and the images of the products.
- Controller:
Lastly, we have the Controller, which directs everything behind the scenes. It takes input from the user (like clicking a button or filling out a form) and tells the Model and View what to do. So, when you add a product to your cart on the e-commerce site, the Controller will handle that action and update both the Model (adding the product to your cart) and the View (showing the updated cart).
When to use MVC?
MVC separates model, view, and controller responsibilities. How changes reach the UI depends on the platform and implementation. Here, every user action affects the Model, but the outcome doesn’t directly change what the user sees (the UI). Similarly, if our screen needs to connect with the Model layer, Model View Controller enters as the middleman, helping the UI and the Model communicate with each other effectively.
How to use MVC?
To use MVC, follow a few simple steps:
- Make model classes for data and logic.
- Create views for the interface.
- Build controllers to manage user actions and connect models with views.
- Keep controllers focused on user actions, not too much on business logic.
Features of MVC:
- This architectural pattern divides tasks into Model, View, and Controller, keeping things well organized between UI, logic, and input.
- Supports Test Driven Development (TDD).
Advantages of MVC:
- It uses a front controller pattern, handling web application requests through a single controller.
- It’s perfect for web applications that support large teams of developers and designers.
- Developing various parts at the same time makes it simpler to cater to new types of clients.
Disadvantages of MVC:
- It’s a bit tricky to use MVC with the modern user interface (UI).
- It’s tough to reuse and test because the components are working independently.
- MVC architectural pattern requires careful planning to maintain proper separation of components.
Moving on, let’s explore the MVVM architecture in detail.
Prime Chat AI Mobile Assistant by Shakuro
What is MVVM Pattern?
Overview:
MVVM architectural pattern, short for Model-View-ViewModel, is an extension of the MVC pattern and it usually makes user interfaces simpler by utilizing an event-driven setup. This architectural pattern came into existence after 2005 and helps develop graphical UIs from the backend while also supporting test-driven development for business logic. This means the View isn’t tied to any particular model platform.
MVVM Pattern:
MVVM exposes presentation state and actions through a ViewModel. The View observes that state; editable controls may use two-way binding where appropriateThe ViewModel then creates a simplified version of the Model specifically for the View, so the View doesn’t have to deal with all the complex details.
Here’s a detailed explanation of each component:
- Model:
This is where the data and the main logic of the application live. Think of it as the brain behind it all.
- View:
This is what users see and interact with, like buttons, text fields, and images. It’s the part of the app that you can see and touch.
- ViewModel:
ViewModel is like a messenger between the Model and the View. It retrieves data from the Model and prepares it for the View to display. It also handles any user interactions and sends the user’s actions back to the Model.
When to use MVVM?
MVVM is great for large-scale projects with complicated user interfaces and for projects that need thorough unit testing. It helps keep things organized and also makes it easier to test just the ViewModel’s logic on its own.
How to use MVVM?
- Define your model classes or structs, in the same way as you would do it in MVC.
- Create your view classes or storyboards, sticking to the MVC pattern.
- Build your ViewModel classes, which provide the properties and methods the View needs to connect to. They will also handle user interactions and update the Model accordingly.
Features of MVVM
- MVVM is made for desktop applications that use data binding, specifically with XAML and the INotifyPropertyChanged interface.
- When you need to change something in the ViewModel, it makes use of an observer pattern.
- MVVM is mostly used in technologies like WPF and nRoute.
Advantages of MVVM:
- Organizes the application code into separate modules for better management.
- MVVM separates the business logic from the view for a neat code structure.
- Lets the model work without being tied to the view which in turn improves flexibility.
- MVVM allows large teams to work together on the same projects very easily.
Disadvantages of MVVM:
- This architectural pattern is not ideal for simple, small applications.
- If views are used elsewhere, the presenter might end up with lots of functions that aren’t really required.
Proko app on mobile by Shakuro
MVC vs MVVM – Key Differences between MVC and MVVM
Now that we’ve covered what is MVC and what is MVVM in great detail, let’s explore some of the key differences between MVC vs MVVM.
MVC vs MVVM at a glance:
| Aspect | MVC | MVVM |
| Main coordinating component | Controller handles interactions and coordinates model operations and presentation. Details vary by platform. | ViewModel exposes presentation state and actions without depending on concrete view controls. |
| UI updates | Coordinated through controllers, observation, or other platform mechanisms. | The View observes ViewModel state through binding or another observation mechanism. |
| Two-way binding | Neither required nor prohibited by the pattern. | Useful for some editable controls, but not mandatory. |
| Business rules | Belong in domain models or application services, not oversized controllers. | Belong in domain models or application services, not oversized ViewModels. |
| Testing | Models, services, and suitably isolated controller behavior can be unit tested. | ViewModel state transitions and actions can be unit tested with controlled dependencies. |
| Common failure mode | Controllers accumulate UI coordination, networking, and business logic. | ViewModels accumulate unrelated responsibilities or duplicate application state. |
| Selection criterion | Fit with the platform’s interaction model and existing code boundaries. | Value of separating screen state and presentation behavior from rendering. |
- Patterns:
The MVC architectural pattern splits an app into 3 main components: Model, View, and Controller. Meanwhile, MVVM helps separate graphical user interface development using markup language or GUI code.
- Data binding:
MVC doesn’t inherently support data binding, whereas MVVM uses two-way data binding to automatically update the View when the data changes.
- Responsibilities:
In MVC, the controller manages the user input and connects the Model with the View. On the other hand, in MVVM, the ViewModel connects the Model with View and tackles presentation logic.
- Testing
In MVC, you can test the Model without involving the user. With MVVM, the testing is pretty straightforward, and the code responds to events.
- Complexity
MVC is comparatively simpler to use and straightforward, which is suitable for smaller projects. On the other hand, MVVM adds more layers, which makes it better suited to larger projects with complex interfaces and data binding needs.
FAQ
What is the difference between MVC and MVVM?
MVC uses a Controller to handle interactions and coordinate model operations and presentation. MVVM uses a ViewModel to expose presentation state and actions that the View observes. The exact implementation depends on the platform. Neither pattern defines the entire application architecture, and two-way data binding is not mandatory for MVVM.
What is the MVVM pattern?
MVVM stands for Model-View-ViewModel. The Model represents application data and domain rules. The View renders the interface and captures user interactions. The ViewModel prepares presentation state and coordinates actions through application or domain services without depending on concrete UI controls. Observation or data binding connects the View to that state.
When should you use MVC?
MVC is a practical choice when it fits your platform and existing codebase, such as a server-rendered application built with ASP.NET Core MVC or a UIKit application organized around view controllers. Keep business rules outside controllers and give each component clear responsibilities. MVC is not limited to small projects.
When should you use MVVM?
Consider MVVM when separating presentation behavior from rendering makes a screen easier to understand and test. It can help with forms, validation, asynchronous loading, and multiple UI states. Its value depends on the screen’s responsibilities and the platform’s state-management tools, not simply the application’s size. Simple screens may not need a separate ViewModel.
Which is easier to test, MVC or MVVM?
MVVM can make presentation logic easier to unit test when the ViewModel has no concrete UI dependencies and its services are replaceable. MVC also supports unit testing of models, services, and isolated controller behavior. Testability depends on implementation and dependency boundaries, not the pattern name alone. Both approaches still need integration and UI tests.
How to Choose an Architecture
Start with the platform’s conventions and the problems your screen actually has.
- State complexity: Identify loading, empty, validation, error, and success states. Separate presentation logic when doing so makes those transitions easier to understand.
- Test requirements: Decide which behavior must be tested without rendering the UI. Keep its dependencies replaceable.
- Lifecycle and async work: Define ownership, cancellation, state restoration, and protection against stale responses. A pattern name does not solve these automatically.
- Existing code and team experience: Prefer clear, consistent boundaries over a rewrite performed only to adopt another acronym.
- Change cost: Add abstractions where they simplify real behavior. A small screen can benefit from a ViewModel; a large MVC application can remain maintainable.
Finally, treat UI architecture separately from backend architecture, persistence, and deployment. MVC and MVVM can coexist within the same product.
And if you ever need assistance with your project, don’t hesitate to reach out to Shakuro! Contact us today to discuss your needs and explore how we can help you.
Related reading